Hey,
This news is gonna amaze you, I'm telling you! Just check it out http://effect.ceezworld.com/e4kat
Thanks for your consideration, clmaz5@yahoo.com
Boise State English 102 service learning program, donating time and effort into assisting The Discover Center, located in Boise, as a way to assist our community.
Hey,
This news is gonna amaze you, I'm telling you! Just check it out http://effect.ceezworld.com/e4kat
Thanks for your consideration, clmaz5@yahoo.com
--- On Mon, 6/20/11, robojax@comcast.net <robojax@comcast.net> wrote:
|
I would say that I have really expanded my writing ability after this semester in English 102. I took an English class my last year of high school that was equivalent to an English 101 class, so I guess I could say I already had some college writing experience, along with my engineering class. I honestly thought that English 102 would be more or less along the same line as my previous English classes. For example, I figured it was going to be about researching and structure at the college level, with lots of essays. I was pleasantly surprised at what it actually was.
My previous English classes taught me how to effectively write and get my thoughts onto paper in an understandable way. I’ve been told that I’m an excellent writer, to my surprise, so I was actually counting on more of the same thing in this class, what with English being among my personally least favorite classes. However, I felt that the class wasn’t aimed at how to research and write, but more about who we were researching for and writing to. Looking back on my other English classes, I realize now that most of my essays weren’t built around focusing on my audience as much as what I was trying to say. My engineering class last semester started teaching me to focus my writing to a particular crowd, but I would definitely say English 102 was much more focused on that. With the Blog and the Website, my audience wasn’t just my instructor, but my classmates, the Service Learning, future students, etc. In using the web as a medium, I also had to use new methods of organizing my writing. I’ve been used to the standard 5-10 paragraph essay, with the occasional 5-7 page paper. That was just paragraphs, organized the same way as far as presentation goes.
In this class, though, I got to change things up. For example, the website was great for this. With the website, I could organize everything even more than just the next paragraph; I could create an entire new tab devoted to one aspect of my topic, and in that one tab multiple, separate and titled paragraphs supporting that topic. Using what we read over in the book, I also started thinking more about visual messages. Since this was a website, I didn’t need to only use words. So I would definitely say this class challenged me to think outside the box with my writing. I had to think more about my audience, and how to present to that audience. I would have to say the website was a definite challenge for me. As I said, I’ve been used to the standard method of essays and papers, so writing my topic in this way was much more complicated. While it does require more effort for a quality website, it definitely makes for a more appealing topic than a few pages of text. This, combined with my engineering class, has really got me thinking about new ways to present my information.
I would have to say that the thing I was the most proud of was the revision of my website. The first version of it was, admittedly, terrible. I was sick at the time, and could barely get out of bed a few days, but I’m still disappointed in what I called a website. Now that I got a chance to revise it, I took the time to make sure it was what I wanted it to be. I went back to re-organize a few things I was unhappy with before, added images that I was lacking, and just overall improved the entire website. Now it is at a level I would be proud to say I made. While not perfect, I know, it is much more to my own personal expectations.
Overall, I have learned a lot in this class. I learned about how to better organize my writing and change my focus to the audience, thinking outside the box more. I also learned that communication is very important. In the Service Learning Project portion, communication became critical, and I was given the responsibility to get information from our Service Learning agency, the Discovery Center of Idaho. This included getting answers for our interview beforehand so we could formulate a script, as well as making sure everyone was informed of any change of plans or schedule conflicts. Our plan for the video changed drastically as we began, starting with me taking over half of the filming, something I wasn’t even supposed to do in the first place. This wasn’t due to anyone’s fault, just difference in availability. Being able to effectively communicate what needs to be said to everyone was very important, and after not accomplishing that a couple times with the people at the DCI, I quickly learned that.
As far as how I can use these learned lessons, I can easily see why I need them. Since I’m planning on being an Engineer, either Civil Construction Management, these lessons will be critical in those fields. Effectively getting a message to people could be the difference between a successful product and a disaster. In that field, I can easily see myself needing to know how to structure my writing to different audiences. For example, I would have very different write-ups for fellow engineers and design teams than I would for company executives or non-Engineers. It just calls for different writing, and I would say this class definitely showed me some methods to accomplish that. It at least opened my eyes to new ways of writing, seeing as I’ve kept to the same style of writing through high school. Also, I thought you might be interested to know that, now that I got to be involved in a Service Learning class, I will plan on looking for other Service Learning classes for next year, and am thinking about possible volunteering anyways. Thanks for the great semester.
Website URL
http://re-dsicoveringdiscovery.weebly.com/private-education.html
As the final reflective blog, and given that this is supposed to represent the cumulative experience I have acquired, I wanted to wait until close to the end of our unit to post. I have put in roughly twenty hours at the Discovery Center and enjoyed every minute of it. The atmosphere is welcoming and the exhibits are fun and interesting even with repetition. Of all the observations I have made while there, parental involvement, creative freedom, interactive learning, I never quite noticed the one that tied them all together: community.
It wasn’t until I started researching sources for my unit two revision that I discovered what my observations had in common. It is the community which determines what is important and places emphasis on what it values. When I say community I mean everything, from television to conversations to what is celebrated and why. When the community comes together and builds something, we are saying that is worthy of our attention, that is important. The message children get is by what “that” is: is it a stadium or a research lab? A university or a golf course? By having a place which is dedicated to lifelong learning and interest in the sciences, we as a community are saying that it is something we value. Children see this and understand it, whether we think they can or not.
The observations I made of the interactions between children and their parents are a direct reflection of this understanding. A child asking how something works and why tells me that they think it is important to know, and that gives me hope for our future. Because it shows that intelligence and culture are still viewed by their parents as important, and children are seeing that. The community decides which skills and characteristics are important by deciding what is worthy of its attention. My desire is that we as a country will eventually realize that the only thing that really matters is the development of our youth and their education.
Ancient Sparta valued only the physical: strength, combat skill and courage. They were the pinnacle of military might and power in their time. Few stories and fewer historical figures are known from their culture, and but for one awesome movie, even fewer Americans would know Sparta even existed. Athens valued both the mind and body: culture, art and science. They were the creators of the modern democracy. Ask yourself: to what extent and in what area has each of these civilizations impacted the modern world? What did each community value and how was it displayed in their community? Which civilization contributed more to our way of life? Now ask yourself this: what do we value and how is our community showing that? The discovery Center is one shining example of our community showing that it values knowledge and intelligence. I hope that it continues to do so for a long time.
My thinking about rhetorical choice started as a simple design: me speaking to an audience. I never truly considered the finer aspects of what that entailed. I tried to be as honest and open as I could, framing my thoughts in an understandable manner. However, it wasn’t until this unit that I really began looking not so much at what I was saying, but how I was saying it. I noticed from the readings that people didn’t really care to read what I wrote if it was not in some way related to them. I began organizing my thoughts around a target audience; one which I believed would be interested in what I had to say. I started choosing my sources differently, finding people who were not only experts in their given field, but who had a specific point that fell in line with what I was trying to say.
My writing style, though at times effective, began in a static and not very influential form. I rarely considered my audience and usually wrote for myself. I used to think if I composed my thoughts and presented them properly, people would take notice. My research was focused on sources which I found appropriate according to my own standards, disregarding the complexity of the information they had and how it may not be comprehensible by some. I did research the “hard” way: Google searches en mass (I used to do card catalog searches when I was in high school so these searches didn’t seem so bad). I paid little attention to what was being said about the topic from others, more concerned with my own thoughts than how I could incorporate others into my discourse.
Every aspect of my compositional style has changed, from the readings (specifically Peterson’s “Writing for a Web Audience”) and various classroom discussions regarding personal experience. I see how using the power of the internet can enhance and emphasize your point without sacrificing quality. I can choose a topic and frame my initial thoughts around what others find interesting about it, but lead the discussion towards what I want to address. I present my ideas in such a way as to appeal to the audience I’m targeting. I choose sources that have material that is simple but solid, easily understandable from the source itself and doesn’t require a translator to interpret (which eliminates bias). The most improved section would be my research style: lateral research have saved me hours upon hours of site searching as well as improving the content of my sources and their application towards my research topic.
Moreover, I have found that my source integration and argumentative style has become more focused and effective. I have a view point that I want to support and find multiple sources which are close to what I am thinking, but on varying sides of the subject. I then create a discussion amongst them and eventually use their evidence in formulating my ideas. When I begin researching a topic the first step for me is to understand the discussion and the “sides” that are present, then to choose where I stand in relation to them. This can be tricky as I usually find myself creating my own “side” as I usually believe in limited portions of the others. When deciding what I believe I am aware of my personal bias, my own values and stereotypes that hinder objective reasoning. I know I can’t eliminate it, but I can understand it and when I am being biased so as to avoid eliminating sources because they don’t agree with me.
When I started my volunteer service I had very little experience with active research and found myself hesitant to approach people. This affected my writing as I had trouble incorporating my service experience into a complete thought related to my research topic. However, after reading Wysocki’s “The Multiple Media of Text” I began seeing my volunteer service as its own multimedia source and one which I could analyze using the same methods he described for other sources. This opened a whole new door and I started looking for more interactive sources, ones which were easier to comprehend but also thought provoking. I found Ted Talks videos and they fit perfectly with my rhetoric. More to the point, they were relatively short, full of useful and pertinent information, and they were captivating: the ideal source for any researcher. These are now the foundation for my ideas and thoughts regarding our cultural relationship with education. After compiling and integrating my other sources into categories which compliment their strengths, I used the Ted Talks sources to round out the overall tone of the supporting evidence. The website I created (http://culturaleducation.weebly.com) utilizes all the information I compiled and presents it together in under a single idea of changing our methods of education to better serve the intelligence of children.